<dd id="rw0xn"></dd>

  • <label id="rw0xn"></label>

  • <sup id="rw0xn"><strike id="rw0xn"></strike></sup><label id="rw0xn"></label>
      <th id="rw0xn"></th>
    1. <var id="rw0xn"></var>
        1. <table id="rw0xn"></table>

          <sub id="rw0xn"><meter id="rw0xn"></meter></sub>

          Techno-economic Comparison of Ultimate Disposal Facilities for CO2 and Nuclear Waste

          Closed for proposals

          Project Type

          Coordinated Research Project

          Project Code

          I12004

          CRP

          1544

          Approved Date

          8 September 2008

          Status

          Closed

          Start Date

          10 December 2008

          Expected End Date

          10 December 2012

          Completed Date

          5 September 2012

          Description

          Participants will explore a range of issues in the geological disposal of CO2 and nuclear waste (NW) relevant for their country in a comparative framework. They will draw on results of earlier research in the relevant fields and on the background material arranged by the IAEA in preparation for this CRP. The investigations will focus on the feasibility, options and capacities for disposing CO2 and NW with a view to geological conditions, potential environmental impacts and socioeconomic circumstances (costs and benefits, legal issues, public acceptance, etc.) prevailing in the participating countries or selected regions thereof.

          Objectives

          The major objective of the CRP was to review the state-of-the-art aspects of the geological disposal of carbon dioxide (CO2) and radioactive waste (radioactive waste) focusing on features and issues of particular relevance to the participating Member States; to prepare an in-depth comparative assessment of the similarities and differences of the geological disposal of CO2 and radioactive waste relevant for the country or selected regions; to identify the already resolved issues and the remaining key challenges; and to evaluate the policy implications emerging from the comparative study.

          Specific objectives

          As part of the Agency’s ongoing work on ‘Sustainable Energy Development’, this CRP generated state-of-the-art information about a range of issues in the geological disposal of CO2 and nuclear waste (NW) relevant for the participating countries in a comparative framework.

          Impact

          Within this CRP the comparative assessment for each disposal option required the involvement and interaction between scientists, engineers, economists, safety analysts, and experts in politics and public acceptance from the participating countries. In each area of the theme sections of the CRP, i.e. geology, site engineering, environment, risk and safety, monitoring, costs, public acceptance, policy, institutions and regulations, very good contacts on the working level have been established. They allow participants to continue to work together and share knowledge and experience in their respective area on a bilateral or multilateral level also after the formal closing of the CRP.
          The different CO2 storage and radioactive waste disposal options are in general considered by two different communities, which are not (yet) very well linked for sharing information. The results of this CRP, as documented in this report, indicate that there are a number of similarities within these two options and that the two communities may learn from each other. But the results also show that from the differences, indicated in this report, useful valuable information may also be derived from both disposal options.

          Relevance

          The CRP research and findings will assist existing and potential interested stakeholders in identifying state-of-the-art information about a range of issues in the geological disposal of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and radioactive waste (radioactive waste). The investigations on the feasibility, options and capacities for geological disposal of CO2 and radioactive waste, prevailing in the participating countries will assist policymaking, particularly in energy and environmental policy field.

          CRP Publications

          Type

          TECDOC

          Year

          2013

          Description

          Techno-economic Comparison of Ultimate Disposal facilities for Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste

          Country/Organization

          IAEA

          Type

          A Special Issues of the International Journal of Global Energy Issues (IJGEI)

          Year

          2013

          Description

          ‘Comparative analysis of the geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste’

          Country/Organization

          Inderscience international publisher

          Stay in touch

          Newsletter

          <dd id="rw0xn"></dd>

        2. <label id="rw0xn"></label>

        3. <sup id="rw0xn"><strike id="rw0xn"></strike></sup><label id="rw0xn"></label>
            <th id="rw0xn"></th>
          1. <var id="rw0xn"></var>
              1. <table id="rw0xn"></table>

                <sub id="rw0xn"><meter id="rw0xn"></meter></sub>
                97碰成人国产免费公开视频